Week 3 assignment was to interpret a project team communication delivered by three different modalities and to reflect upon each. The key to successful project management is effective communication- sharing the right message with the right people in a timely manner (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008 p.)
Email
When I read the email, my first thought was that it could be easily misinterpreted by the intended audience (Mark). Second, I didn’t feel like the message was clear and concise and even lacked the purpose of the email. Emails should be concise, clear and relevant. Following those three guidelines your communications is less likely to waste the time on overly verbose messages, or messages that require additional clarification later (unknown n. d.). I also noticed the communication did not begin with a purpose. Stating the purpose of the email is a critical component to effective communication (Stolovitch n. d.). Written communications should include the following:
- Begin with a clear purpose
- State the situation
- Include possible solutions
- Indicate if sign off is required
- Specify the form that the response is required to take
- Keep tone business and respectful (Stolovitch n. d.)
There was no detailed information provided about what type of report which could also lead the intended recipient to ask for further clarification instead of just sending over the report to Jane.
Voicemail
While the tone of the voicemail was warm and welcoming it did not provide the detail the recipient needs without further clarification (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008 p. 357). From the tone in the voicemail it seemed that Jane had a pretty good rapport with Mark and she understood his scheduling constraints as if they were a common occurrence. Even though Jane could miss her deadline, in her message she was not clear on when she needed the report.
Face-to-Face
While the face-to-face communication appears to be the most effective means to communication the project needs of Jane, the message was not different. She was not clear or concise with the report she needed. I do applaud the effort of not relying on the written communication or voicemail message that could be misinterpreted. She should have wrapped up the face-to-face meeting with confirmation that’ll she would also send an email to document the conversation between the two of them with the specific report needed the time she needed the report so she does not miss her deadline. I’m not sure the smile at the end of the face-to-face communication was meant as a warm gesture or she was smiling in hopes that Mark would follow through with her request.
References
Portny, S.E., Mantel, S.J., meredith, J.R. Shafer, S.M., Sutton, M.M., & Kramer, B.E. (2008), Project managment:Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hobken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Stolovitch, H. (n. d.). Project Management and Instrcutional Design. Retrieved June 27,2012. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1342057_1%26url%3D
Unknown (n. d.). 6 Tips to tame the email monster. Retrieved July 14,2012. http://www.duration-driven.com/2010/08/6-tips-to-tame-the-e-mail-monster/#more-303